We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
A reduced court might not rule against a binding precedent, even though it feels that it can be unjust; it may only express the hope that a higher court or perhaps the legislature will reform the rule in question. If the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and needs to evade it and help the law evolve, it could either hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts in the cases; some jurisdictions allow for a judge to recommend that an appeal be completed.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents in the boy or Woman usually do not approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they are able to do if they're able to cut off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who's a major, the pair is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who presents these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by law.
This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners failed a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based around the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances from the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court could interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mold the relief to really make it ideal to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the decision of the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
145 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year old boy from his home to protect him from the Awful physical and sexual abuse he had suffered in his home, also to prevent him from abusing other children during the home. The boy was placed in an unexpected emergency foster home, and was later shifted close to within the foster care system.
In federal or multi-jurisdictional legislation systems there may perhaps exist conflicts between the varied decrease appellate courts. Sometimes these differences is probably not resolved, and it may be necessary to distinguish how the regulation is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.
On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of the boy by a guardian advertisement litem, against DCFS, the social worker, plus the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf on the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advert litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court to get a dismissal based on absolute immunity, because they were all performing in their Employment with DCFS.
twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons obtaining their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to your Government service will be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to do absent with the candidature with the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance on the respondents that pensionary benefits may be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section 20 on the Sindh famous family law cases Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does supply for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established through the government.
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to get gathered with the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent along with the case under appeal, Possibly overruling the previous case law by setting a brand new precedent of higher authority. This could come about several times given that the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first of your High Court of Justice, later with the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his improvement in the concept of estoppel starting in the High Trees case.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” aren't binding, but may very well be used as persuasive authority, which is to provide substance to your party’s argument, or to guide the present court.